Barry Soetoro, Esq., the Gerbilmeister™ at Birther Report™ has a new interview, continuing his total BS theories that these mass shooting and bombing incidents you hear about in the news (Boston Marathon bombing, Sandy Hook and Charleston shootings) are fake—political theater to affect public opinion on the 2nd Amendment. The general approach is to find something they don’t understand in an image, or take a misstatement, and from there jump to the absurd conclusion that the events themselves were contrived and fake. The story is that the victims are actors, and are alive and well. In the real world, people are connected by family, friends, co-workers, and they don’t just pretend to die en masse.
Conspiracy theorists are erroneously labeling these purported fakes as “false flag operations,” but that is a misuse of the term. False flag refers to a real event wrongly attributed.
Now Soetoro tells Mike Shoesmith, that his fake violence stories fit in with more general birther claims that Barack Obama’s identity is equally fake. The CIA is behind it all, and Obama himself will disappear like the shooting victims. Some people seem to actually believe this BS.
Note: BSE appears to have deleted all of his gerbil images.
We read Birther Report so you don't have to.
Wednesday, October 14, 2015
Logging you in...Comments by IntenseDebate
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
ThePunchmaster 63p · 495 weeks ago
realitycheck1776 77p · 495 weeks ago
realitycheck1776 77p · 495 weeks ago
I've never been afraid to debate any of the Obots on their sites. It always ends with me getting banned because y'all can't handle the facts when I start bringing them. Right RC? The exception is Gerbil Report - there y'all cut & run.
Rambo continues to hide meekly at BR where he knows I am banned. I lifted all bans at my blog. Rambo was banned for calling me a liar I have reinstated him although it's a good bet he will not abide by the rules this time either.
nancyrowens 83p · 495 weeks ago
★ Gerbil ★ FALCON 53p · 495 weeks ago
realitycheck1776 77p · 494 weeks ago
ramboike 101p · 494 weeks ago
Obot, October 24, 2015 at 3:41 pm: "The founders et al lived and breathed English common law–it structured essentially every legal aspect of their lives, and cases and controversies were resolved via their common law courts of law and equity."
Would Blackstone be considered an authority on English Common Law for that time period?
Blackstone's Commentaries, Introduction, Sect 4- Of the Countries Subject to the Laws of England:
Our American plantations are principally of this latter sort, being obtained in the last century either by right of conquest and driving out the natives (with what natural justice I shall not at present inquire) or by treaties. And therefore the common law of England, as such, has no allowance or authority there; they being no part of the mother country, but distinct (though dependent) dominions. They are subject however to the control of the parliament, though (like Ireland, Man, and the rest) not bound by any acts of parliament, unless particularly named.
ramboike 101p · 493 weeks ago
On obamaconspiracy.org, the poster known as “Lupin” is still misleading the gullible Obots:
Lupin: "In the case of the “two citizens parents” I have asked Apuzzo and his ilk I don’t know how many times to find me a credible source — any source, really — that validates their nonsensical theory prior to 2008, and I’m still waiting.
I mean, really… As I often say, there’s been just as much scholarship about Vattel as there’s likely been and bout Blackstone etc. You would think that if anyone in 200+ years had put forth that notion, they could find some evidence of it.
But no, they can’t — because there is none. And yet, naive, ill-educated, gullible folks like CJR somehow think they’ve chanced onto something new!"
`````````````````
Lupin & his gullible followers know I presented the conclusive irrefutable physical proof months ago in this forum. There's no wiggle room for him on this. It's incomprehensible Lupin would continue to make such false claims after being shown the error of his ways and having some of his documented false claims corrected on the site.
nancyrowens 83p · 492 weeks ago
nancyrowens 83p · 491 weeks ago
Stephen Lemons @stephenlemons 3m3 minutes ago
Big question among observers: did Zullo really crack or was this planned.After all,began answering Mastersons Qs right away #ArpaioContempt
realitycheck1776 77p · 490 weeks ago
realitycheck1776 77p · 490 weeks ago
I would have to say that your claim that the fact that the 1966 certified copy of the Nordyke BC looks different than a 2011 certified BC is proof of forgery is stupid even by your standards. What's your next trick? Are you going to take up Sarge's claim that a document from 1961 can't have layers?
pabloswhiterabbit -50p · 490 weeks ago
My name is Nancy Ruth Owens and I forged Obama's birth certificates in 1985 for the Medellin Cartel.
pabloswhiterabbit -50p · 489 weeks ago
MCCCP Motto: "Damn The Nation. Get The Donation."
ramboike 101p · 488 weeks ago
I left the following comment, currently in moderation:
“Cruz was born a US citizen because his mother was a US citizen meeting the residency requirements. These are undisputed historical facts and that is the evidence. Cruz doesn’t need a piece of paper to be a US citizen. He was born one by law.”
“You might argue a legal theory under which he’s not eligible to be president, but not that he’s ineligible for the Senate. That’s just plain nonsense.”
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Did you overlook this part:
JB Williams: The statutes governing this naturalization process state;
“A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met. The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America (CRBA) to document that the child is a U.S. citizen. If the U.S. embassy or consulate determines that the child acquired U.S. citizenship at birth, a consular officer will approve the CRBA application and the Department of State will issue a CRBA, also called a Form FS-240, in the child’s name.”
Unfortunately, there is no evidence to suggest that the parent or parents of Ted Cruz ever filed a CRBA form with the U.S. Government in or around 1970, which is why Ted Cruz released a copy of his Canadian citizenship records and not any U.S. citizenship records. At present, all FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests filed in search of any U.S. citizenship documents to confirm the true official U.S. citizenship status of Ted Cruz have been denied access. All citizenship records for Ted Cruz are sealed unless and until Ted Cruz agrees to allow any such records to be released by either U.S. or Canadian agencies.
realitycheck1776 77p · 487 weeks ago
The fact that Evans changed his story can be chalked up to obvious reasons. What obvious reasons? Oh, you mean he was threatened like a conspiracy kook like you would say? Your problem is Amercrombie never finding a birth certificate as he promised. What Anbercrombie was told is that Hawaii laws prohibited him from releasing private records.Had he done so through his investigation he would of announced it to the world. Now return to the Daily Mail article I gave a link for and reread the 5th paragraph.Oh you mean the secondary source that you Googled and had to go overseas to find another source that misquoted the Honolulu newspaper interview like WND did? Go back to the original interview and tell me where Abercrombie ever said he couldn't find the birth certificate.
Game-Set-Match
Game, set, and match. Barack Obama is still President. Unlike Ramblo I can show evidence of my win.
Owens_TheForger 48p · 485 weeks ago
Not that he ended it.
It doesn't matter. Abercrombie is lying through his teeth when he claims he was there at my brother's Hawaiian birth.
decuff 59p · 463 weeks ago
It's not that communists can't handle the truth but finds the truth offensive; too much for them to bare? Discover their truth at; the one stop shop for the truth.